Avail.video
Avail.video · Watched for you · 18:45 video · 2 min read

reMarkable Paper Pro vs Paper Pro Move: The Honest Truth

Outlier score4.9×Overperformer

81,595 views vs a median of 16,669 across the channel's last 15 long-form uploads · as of Oct 28

Avail.video calculation

Mark Gilroy compares the large 11.8-inch reMarkable Paper Pro with the ultra-portable 7.3-inch Paper Pro Move after a month of hands-on daily use. He evaluates their premium hardware, slow-refresh color E-ink displays, software ecosystem, and steep accessory costs against traditional iPads. Ultimately, he finds the devices do not replace full-featured tablets, but the smaller Move serves as an exceptional distraction-free digital notebook.

Read the teardown

How it earns the click and holds attention, second by second.

11chapters8on-screen captures2people16claims and stats15references in all
Source: Should you buy a reMarkable? (a brutally honest review) · That Mark Gilroy
Find in this video

Search what was said and shown

One search covers the transcript, on-screen text, claims and references. Every result jumps to its moment.

    The explainer

    What the video says, with a link to every moment

    A 2-minute read. Each underlined phrase opens the video at that second.

    Choosing between digital paper tablets often comes down to balancing tactile focus against the versatility of standard consumer tablets. In this comprehensive comparison, Mark Gilroy evaluates the full-sized reMarkable Paper Pro alongside the compact Move0:08 after using both as daily drivers for note-taking, reading, and document annotation. Coming from an iPad ecosystem, his initial skepticism centered around whether a single-purpose, slow-refresh E-ink screen could ever justify its steep investment.

    The discussion begins with the extensive costs of the reMarkable lineup1:38. The larger Paper Pro starts at $629, but essential add-ons quickly escalate the price. Upgrading to the Marker Plus with an eraser1:58 adds $50, protective cases range up to $179 for premium leather, and the magnetic Type Folio keyboard accessory2:18 commands $229. Gilroy also criticizes the ongoing Connect subscription model2:37, which locks handwriting-to-text conversion, cloud synchronization, and template access behind an annual fee despite the tablets packing 64 GB of internal storage. Meanwhile, the smaller Paper Pro Move starts at $4494:09, offering cross-compatible stylus support with its sibling while excluding the keyboard option.

    quote
    @Dashdashdash199: I would buy one if it was more affordable@N14Z96: - what's holding you back from buying : extortionate price@ProfessorTechNerd: They are both ridiculously overpriced@Stevecroft-e2s: Yes, I think one of these would be great for ministry but it is way to pricey.
    ▶ 1:32
    On screen at 1:32

    Hardware design and screen form factor provide the sharpest contrast between the devices. The Paper Pro delivers an 11.8-inch Canvas color display5:48 that excels at reviewing full-page PDFs and sketching without zooming, backed by reliable palm rejection. Conversely, the 7.3-inch Paper Pro Move weighs 230g6:31, fitting easily into jacket pockets and sling bags. While both models feature identical Linux-based software and provide two-week battery life6:44, Gilroy questions the utility of the Type Folio keyboard case, noting that typing without a spell checker or browser feels like using a modern typewriter. He also highlights how the color display refresh latency8:59 introduces a noticeable pause when applying colored highlighter marks.

    stat
    Two weeks of battery: Up to 14 days of regular use on days in standby mode.
    ▶ 6:44
    On screen at 6:44

    Ultimately, Gilroy examines whether paper tablets solve real user problems or simply restrict workflow. While disciplined users can emulate a quiet setup using iPad focus modes14:56 or alternatives like the Boox Palma and Supernote Nomad16:33, reMarkable devices thrive for professionals and daily journalers wanting zero notifications. Concluding that these tablets represent a replacement for physical notebooks17:47 rather than iPads, Gilroy chooses the pocketable Paper Pro Move17:59 as his favorite everyday companion.

    Highlights
    1. 0:00Introduction to the Paper Pro and Move
    2. 8:29Color E-ink display refresh latency
    Chapters across the 18:45 runtime
    How it's told

    A structured side-by-side hardware comparison

    Format: Review. Host Mark Gilroy conducts a comprehensive comparison between the reMarkable Paper Pro and Paper Pro Move, weighing hardware quality, latency, and subscription costs against conventional paper and the iPad. He tests daily productivity use cases before explaining why he ultimately chose the smaller model.

    Story arc

    1. 0:00IntroductionMark Gilroy introduces the reMarkable Paper Pro and the compact Paper Pro Move, setting up the key dilemma between them.
    2. 1:29Price breakdownGilroy tallies the base hardware costs, stylus upgrades, folio covers, and the Connect recurring subscription.
    3. 5:10Hardware & featuresAn in-depth look at build dimensions, weight differences, palm rejection, battery life, and typing on the Type Folio.
    4. 8:29Display & softwareAnalysis of the Canvas Color display latency, full-screen refresh flashes, Linux OS limitations, and DRM-free ebook reading.
    5. 12:28Sponsor integrationSurfshark VPN integration focusing on public Wi-Fi security and data masking.
    6. 13:42Real-world valueEvaluation of whether single-purpose digital paper solves an actual problem compared to physical notebooks or an iPad.
    7. 15:20Buying guide & verdictAudience recommendations, refurbished options, and Gilroy's final decision to keep the Paper Pro Move.

    Setups and payoffs

    1. 0:11Setup Host asks which device fits the viewer best and hints that one specific model won him over.
      ↳
      17:57Payoff Host reveals he is keeping the Paper Pro Move due to its portable, notebook-like form factor.
    2. 1:13Setup Host acknowledges his initial iPad bias and skepticism toward single-function tablets.
      ↳
      17:43Payoff Host concludes that reMarkable tablets replace paper notebooks rather than multipurpose iPads.
    3. 2:23Setup Host previews that he will demonstrate and evaluate the Type Folio keyboard case later.
      ↳
      6:58Payoff Host details the Type Folio typing ergonomics, lack of spell check, and distraction-free software mode.

    Devices

    • On-screen handwritten arithmeticWriting out cumulative device and accessory prices on screen to illustrate total cost of ownership.0:351:444:1216:14
    • Direct screen capture comparisonSide-by-side video captures demonstrating color E-ink latency and black-flash refresh behavior.8:529:07
    • Rapid pros-and-cons question formatStructuring segments around direct viewer objections and purchase decision questions.1:215:0015:20

    From the video's own structure, matched to the transcript and on-screen text.

    Teardown

    This video succeeds by validating buyer skepticism up front, breaking down hidden costs, and showing real hardware flaws on camera instead of repeating marketing claims.

    A real overperformer: 4.9× its typical views (81,595 vs a median of 16,669 across the channel's last 15 long-form uploads, as of Oct 28) · Long-form review · 245 days old

    The promise

    A direct, unfiltered buying decision on whether a reMarkable tablet is actually worth your money.

    Packaging

    How it looks in the feed

    Show the feed as
    18:45

    Should you buy a reMarkable? (a brutally honest review)

    That Mark Gilroy81K views · 8mo agoGo to https://surfshark.com/markgilroy or use code MARKGILROY at checkout to get 4 extra months of Surfshark VPN!* In this video I compare reMarkable's latest…

    Views and age as of the teardown, Oct 28, 2026. Other videos are blanked out.

    • 4/5Thumbnail imageThe creator's pained grimace and orange beanie immediately pull the eye, framed symmetrically by two e-ink tablets. It conveys tension and indecision instantly, even at small sizes.Creator in an orange beanie centered against a gray backdrop, grimacing while holding up two tablets displaying contrasting handwritten questions.
    • 3/5Thumbnail textThe pun 'PAPER PRO MOVE?' adds playful intrigue, but having text spread across both screens plus the brand logo makes it slightly busy.'reMarkable' sits across the top, while the left screen reads 'PAPER PRO?' and the right screen reads 'PAPER PRO MOVE?'.
    • 4/5TitleDirectly targets buyers on the fence with a high-intent search query. The bracketed phrase promises that standard reviewer hype will be stripped away.Uses a direct question ('Should you buy a reMarkable?') paired with an emotional modifier in parentheses ('(a brutally honest review)').
    • 4/5Title + thumbnailThey divide the work cleanly: the title qualifies the viewer and promises raw truth, while the thumbnail shows a specific hardware dilemma and visible buyer skepticism.The title asks if you should buy one, while the thumbnail shows the creator wincing between two distinct models.

    Curiosity gap: What critical flaws make this reviewer hesitate to recommend the reMarkable Paper Pro?

    The three hooks

    The title, the thumbnail text and the first words spoken each make a promise, and each does a different job.

    • Title“Should you buy a reMarkable? (a brutally honest review)”Curiosity gapCuriosityLoss aversionIt makes prospective buyers want to know the device's hidden downsides before committing hundreds of dollars.
    • Thumbnail text“reMarkable PAPER PRO? PAPER PRO MOVE?”Curiosity gapCuriosityNoveltyIt makes the viewer wonder if upgrading to the Paper Pro is a smart decision or a regretful mistake.
    • First words spoken“So you're thinking about buying one of these reMarkable e-ink note-takers?”DiagnosisCuriosityLoss aversionIt targets viewers actively weighing an expensive tech purchase and promises to reveal whether either device is actually worth their money.
    • PairingDifferent jobsThe thumbnail introduces the specific hardware comparison, while the title frames the overall purchasing dilemma.
    • StakesFitsSpending between $450 and $800 on a single-purpose tablet is a major financial risk, so unfiltered buying advice provides genuine value.
    • UrgencyNoneThe review focuses on an enduring hardware purchase decision without creating false scarcity or time-sensitive panic.

    The first 20 seconds

    TimeWhat you seeWhat you hearWhat it does
    0:00Man in beanie and white t-shirt facing camera in dim studio lighting with a vertical light tube behind him."So you're thinking about buying..."Addresses the viewer's buying dilemma directly in the opening frame.
    0:01Host raises two digital paper tablets into frame, one in each hand."...one of these reMarkable..."Visually proves he has both products in hand.
    0:02Host holds both screens facing the lens, smiling with raised eyebrows."...e-ink note-takers?"Confirms the exact product category from the video title.
    0:03Cut to clean tabletop B-roll of the large reMarkable tablet standing upright with notes on screen."You've got the big one, the Paper Pro..."Introduces the first option with a clear product shot.
    0:04Static shot of the reMarkable Paper Pro on wooden desk with stylus attached."...or..."Gives viewer a clear look at handwritten readability.
    0:05Close product view of the Paper Pro screen."...the small one..."Sets up the comparison against the smaller model.
    0:06Cut back to host holding both tablets."...the Paper Pro Move."Names the second model while displaying physical size difference.
    0:07Cut to tabletop B-roll of the smaller tablet upright on desk showing a PDF library."I'm going to help you..."Shows the compact form factor and software interface.
    0:08Static product shot of the smaller tablet."...decide which one..."Promises a clear purchasing recommendation.
    0:09Top-down overhead view of hands holding both devices side-by-side over a wooden desk."...is best for you."Shows direct side-by-side scale comparison in practical use.
    0:10Hands adjust both tablets side-by-side showing full menus."Maybe..."Maintains visual focus on real hardware comparison.
    0:11Top-down comparison continues as background music pulses gently."...you should get both..."Proposes a premium dual-device option.
    0:12Close overhead shot of both tablets side by side."...or perhaps..."Pivots to an unexpected alternative.
    0:13Cut back to host holding both devices to camera with a skeptical expression."...you should give them a miss."Introduces brutal honesty, warning viewer not to waste money.
    0:14Host holds both devices steady, looking intensely at the camera.Background synth beat swells.Builds tension around whether neither device is worth it.
    0:15Host looks at camera with wide eyes."Let's find out."Closes the setup and transitions to the main review.
    0:16Screen cuts to black with glitch sound effect.Bass drop and glitch swoosh.Signals the start of the title sequence.
    0:17White cross graphic snaps onto black background.Heavy electronic impact sound.Visual branding punctuation mark.
    0:18Pixelated geometric distortion morphs into channel logo.Synthesizer riser.Short stylized logo transition.
    0:19Logo locks in: white hexagon with letter 'm' and text 'THAT MARK GILROY'.Audio tail decays.Displays channel identity quickly.
    0:20Logo fades down to transition to the body of the video.Audio silence into next scene.Hands off smoothly into the main content.
    Click confirmation
    The first frame and spoken sentence immediately call out the buying dilemma, and by 00:02 the host holds both reMarkable tablets up to the lens.
    Time to the point
    0:08
    Hook
    question, stakes, contrarian take
    Reason to stay
    The host raises the real possibility that buying either tablet might be a waste of money ('or perhaps you should give them a miss').
    Missing on purpose
    No generic greeting, no channel pitch, no life update, and no sponsor read before stating the problem.
    Pace and texture
    Fast and deliberate, switching between talking head and B-roll every 2 to 3 seconds over a rhythmic electronic beat.

    Story map

    Versus/comparison. A skeptical iPad user tests two premium reMarkable digital paper tablets against daily workflows to determine whether a restricted, expensive device can ever justify its cost over standard tablets or paper.

    TimeSectionNew tensionStakesTurnLoops
    0:00 –1:28Introduction & iPad BiasAre these expensive E-ink tablets worth hundreds of dollars, or should you skip them entirely?RiseGilroy admits he went in wanting to hate them because his iPad does far more for less money.Opens: Which model won him over, and can either device justify its price tag?
    1:28 –5:09Total Cost & Hidden Add-OnsWhat is the true price once essential pens, cases, and software fees are included?RiseThe base tablet is essentially incomplete without expensive accessories and a recurring software subscription for basic handwriting search.Opens: Can the hardware experience justify an $800 total price tag?
    5:09 –8:29Hardware Scale & The Type FolioDoes the premium hardware and keyboard folio turn the device into a genuine productivity machine?HoldThe keyboard hardware is well built, but stripped-down software turns it into an overpriced modern typewriter without email or spellcheck.Opens: How do writing feel, latency, and the color screen hold up in real use?Closes: Can the Paper Pro replace a laptop or iPad for typing?
    8:29 –12:22Display Quirks & Deliberate PacingDoes the new color E-ink display improve note-taking or introduce annoying latency?HoldColor highlighters force an ugly screen flash, yet the overall slowness creates a focused, journal-like rhythm that physical paper users love.Opens: Does this intentional friction justify the cost for ordinary buyers?Closes: How color ink latency, reading ebooks, and erasing actually work.
    12:22 –13:41Sponsor Break (Surfshark VPN)How can one tool protect devices on public Wi-Fi?FallSag: no turn
    13:41 –16:48Alternatives & Target AudienceDoes reMarkable solve an actual problem when pen, paper, and iPads already exist?RiseYou can get distraction-free focus on an iPad for free, meaning reMarkable only fits heavy daily writers who burn through paper journals.Opens: Which specific device should the viewer pick?Closes: Whether focus alone is enough to justify an $800 price tag.
    16:48 –18:45Verdict & Personal ChoiceWhich specific tablet wins, and which one does the reviewer actually keep?HoldNeither device replaces an iPad, but the compact Move perfectly replaces a physical paper notebook.Closes: Which tablet the viewer should buy and which one Mark kept.

    Payoff: delivered fully at 17:55. Gilroy delivers clear purchase rules for both models and reveals why he personally chose the smaller Paper Pro Move over the flagship. Ending: He concludes that reMarkable replaces paper notebooks rather than iPads, names his personal keeper, and routes viewers to an iPad buyer's guide card on the end screen.

    Leaks

    Where a viewer might leave. Guesses from watching, not retention data.

    • 2:34 Breaking down monthly subscription tiers and cloud limits turns visual momentum into software fine print.
    • 7:54 Dwelling on the missing spellcheck and typing limitations drags for viewers who only care about handwriting.
    • 12:22 An abrupt pivot into a VPN sponsor break interrupts the hardware analysis.
    • 16:13 Re-calculating the total ownership cost repeats pricing points already covered earlier in the video.

    Steal this

    1. Frame an expensive niche product against the dominant market alternative instead of reviewing it in a vacuum. It gives viewers an instant reference point for price and utility, grounding abstract features in familiar terms. 1:13
    2. Demonstrate visual hardware quirks in real time with tight macro capture rather than just talking about them. Showing the jarring black screen flash when using color ink proves the flaw without sounding like an exaggeration. 8:52
    3. Reframe a severe functional drawback as an intentional emotional benefit. Calling the sluggish interface an intentional way to slow down and focus transforms a tech deficit into a lifestyle selling point. 11:42
    4. Route viewers who decide against the product directly into an alternative guide on your own channel. Captures viewers who were talked out of buying the review subject and retains them for a related video. 18:20

    Skip this

    • Buying two flagship hardware units and every official accessory out of pocket just to compare them. This requires significant upfront budget that only established tech channels can afford.
    • Stretching out subscription and cloud storage critiques across multiple talking-head segments. It works here because tech buyers care about hidden ownership costs, but on general lifestyle reviews it drags pacing down.

    Open questions

    • What proportion of the total views came from organic search queries versus home feed recommendations?
    • Did the affiliate links generate substantial revenue given that the host actively advised many viewers not to buy?

    Teardown by Avail.video from the thumbnail, the title, the first 20 seconds and the report's notes on the whole video.

    On screen

    Everything the video showed you

    Slides, frameworks, quotes and formulas, captured verbatim with the moment they appeared. Tap any card to jump there.

    Reference shelf

    People, ideas and things mentioned

    Said means mentioned aloud; Shown means it appeared on screen.

    People2

    • Mark GilroyTech reviewer and YouTube content creator hosting the channel That Mark Gilroy.0:00Said + shown13:22Said
    • Jeff BezosFounder of Amazon.10:18Said

    Organizations1

    • Surfshark VPNVirtual Private Network and cybersecurity provider sponsoring the video.0:19Shown12:23Said + shown13:24Shown

    Things on screen12

    • reMarkable Paper ProLarge 11.8-inch color E-ink digital paper tablet developed by reMarkable.0:02Said + shown1:45Said + shown5:48Said + shown
    • reMarkable Paper Pro MoveCompact 7.3-inch color E-ink notebook tablet designed for portable note-taking.0:07Said + shown4:00Said + shown17:59Said + shown
    • Marker PlusreMarkable's premium stylus accessory equipped with a textured finish and physical eraser cap.1:56Said + shown11:20Said + shown
    • reMarkable Book FolioProtective case cover for reMarkable tablets.2:06Said + shown
    • Type FolioSlim magnetic protective case with integrated hardware keyboard for Paper Pro.2:18Said + shown6:58Said + shown
    • reMarkable ConnectCloud subscription service providing unlimited storage, handwriting conversion, and template sync.2:37Said + shown
    • iPad MiniApple's compact multipurpose tablet used as a size and capability benchmark.1:12Said + shown6:12Said + shown
    • CalibreOpen-source e-book management software used for converting and stripping DRM from e-books.10:28Shown
    • Boox PalmaPocket-sized mobile E-ink device mentioned as a budget alternative.16:33Said + shown
    • Supernote NomadCompact digital note-taking tablet developed by Ratta Supernote.16:34Said + shown
    • Plaud NoteDedicated pocket AI voice recorder and transcription device.4:11Said + shown14:10Said + shown
    • MacBookApple laptop referenced for keyboard typing feel comparison.7:35Said
    Video description

    A description you can paste into YouTube

    A hook, a summary, chapters in YouTube's format and what the video mentions. Copy it, edit it, and paste it into YouTube Studio.

    1,394 / 5,000 characters
    By the numbers

    What YouTube shows about this video and its channel

    As of Oct 28, 2026. YouTube's public numbers first, then Avail.video's own arithmetic on them.

    The video

    Views
    81.6K
    Likes
    891
    Comments
    174
    Published
    Feb 24, 2026
    Length
    18:45
    Category
    Science & Technology
    YouTube's topics
    Lifestyle (sociology), Technology
    Captions
    No
    HD
    Yes
    Language
    British English
    Paid promotion
    Declared
    Made for kids
    No
    License
    Standard YouTube

    Creator's tags

    • remarkable paper pro
    • remarkable paper pro move
    • surfshark vpn
    • remarkable marker pro
    • remarkable 2 vs remarkable paper pro
    • remarkable review
    • ipad vs remarkable
    • ipad vs remarkable paper pro
    • ipad mini vs remarkable paper pro moveipad mini vs remarkable paper pr
    • kindle
    • best e-ink tablet
    • ipad mini 7
    • supernote nomad
    • boox palma
    • craft docs

    The channel

    That Mark Gilroy@thatmarkgilroy
    Subscribers
    43.6K
    Videos
    350
    Total views
    10.7M
    Channel age
    12 years (since Nov 2013)
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Uploads
    about every 5 days
    Across the last 15 long-form uploads
    Before this video
    —

    Calculated by Avail.video from YouTube's public numbers

    Outlier score
    4.9× · Overperformer
    Views against the median of the channel's last 15 long-form uploads
    Views per subscriber
    1.87
    Likes vs the channel's usual
    0.8× the channel's usual
    1.1% of views vs a usual 1.4%
    Comments vs the channel's usual
    0.9× the channel's usual
    0.21% of views vs a usual 0.24%
    Rank among recent uploads
    #3 of 16
    By views: this video and the channel's last 15 long-form uploads
    Take it to your AI

    Ask Claude or ChatGPT about this video

    Copy this report as context, paste it into a chat, then ask anything. It includes timestamps, so answers can point back to the video.

    Then ask
    • Turn the main ideas into a checklist I can use this week.
    • What are the strongest claims in this video, and what evidence does it give for each?
    • Write a short summary for someone who hasn't watched it, linking the key moments.
    • Quiz me on this video, one question at a time, and cite the timestamp for each answer.

    Watched by Avail.video · 2026-10-28